Cases 1 - 7 of 7
HO-HO-KUS, INC. v. SUCHARSKI et al
as 2:2023cv01677
Plaintiff:
HO-HO-KUS, INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN SUCHARSKI, JANEEN SUCHARSKI and SAJE AEROSPACE, INC.
Arconic Corp.In re: Arconic Corp.
as 22-1917
Petitioner:
In re: ARCONIC CORP
Respondent:
ARCONIC INC, HOWMET AEROSPACE INC, NOVELIS INC and others
AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC v. YIM et al
as 2:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC
Defendant:
BYUNG CHAN YIM, HYO SUN KIM, ASSURED COMPONENTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jill Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp
as 14-8124
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JILL SIKKELEE, Individually and as Personal Respresentative of the Estate of David Sikkelee, deceased
Defendant - Respondent:
PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORP and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
AVCO CORP
Jill Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corp
as 14-8120
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JILL SIKKELEE, Individually and as Personal Respresentative of the Estate of David Sikkelee, deceased
Defendant - Respondent:
PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORP, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORP and others
Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporatio, et al
as 12-8081
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JILL SIKKELEE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of David Sikkelee, Deceased
Defendant - Respondent:
PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORPORATION, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Precision Airmotive Corporation, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Borg-Warner Corporation, and Marvel-Schebler, a Division of Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
AVCO CORPORATION
Bigl et al v. X-Treme Aerospace Inc. et al
as 1:2008mc00128
Plaintiff:
James J. Bigl, Janice Dimonaco and George Bengston
Defendant:
X-Treme Aerospace Inc., Canyon Oil Corporation, John M. Goodwin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
