Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. Ryan Keel
as 23-2064
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RYAN KEEL
Jesse Keel v. Septa's Philadelphia Housing A, et al
as 21-2365
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSE LEE KEEL
Defendant / Appellee:
SEPTA'S PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUHORITY C.L.S., C.B.H.I.C.M.S., PHILADELPHIA CITY'S C.B.H.S. and others
Debtor / Appellee:
TD BANK
Michael Keeling v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 21-1369
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KEELING
Carl Keeling v. Smith & Nephew Inc, et al
as 20-1924
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL KEELING
Defendant / Appellee:
SMITH & NEPHEW INC
Defendant:
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS
Michael Keeling v. Superintendent Dallas SCI
as 19-2214
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL KEELING
Quintez Talley v. Dorina Varner, et al
as 19-1824
Defendant / Appellee:
KEEL, Lieutenant, CAPTAIN SUNDERLAND, FACILITY MANAGER KAUFFMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINTEZ TALLEY
In re: Michael Keeling
as 17-1976
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
KEEL et al v. AXELROD et al
as 2:2015cv01507
Plaintiff:
FRANK KEEL and KEEL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
Defendant:
DAVID AXELROD and PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
In re: Michael Keeling
as 13-1688
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL EVAN KEELING
Defendant - Respondent:
MICHAEL KLOPOTOSKI, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN
KEELING et al v. MCGUIGAN LAW OFFICE, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04388
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KEELING and MELANIE KEELING
Defendant:
MCGUIGAN LAW OFFICE, LLC, KENTWOOD LAW GROUP and ROOMS-TO-GO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
