Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-2382
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Michael Crooker v. W MA Credit Co, et al
as 10-1898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
W MA CREDIT CO, PINE CREDIT & COLLECTION AGCY, PETER ROBERTS & ASSOC and others
CROOKER v. R.I. CREDIT SERVICE, LLC et al
as 5:2010cv01351
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN CROOKER
Defendant:
R.I. CREDIT SERVICE, LLC, MASS CREDIT SERVICE , LYNETT & LYNETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crooker v. Adams, Stevens & Bradley et al
as 4:2010cv00499
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Crooker
Defendant:
Adams, Stevens & Bradley, Credit Center, Recovery Options Management and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crooker v. Northeast Creditors et al
as 3:2010cv00381
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Crooker
Defendant:
Northeast Creditors, Northeast Creditors, Valentine & Kebartas, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Crooker v. Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00356
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Crooker
Defendant:
Popular Mortgage Servicing, Inc., First Federal Credit Control, JL Russell & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
