Cases 1 - 10 of 244
Eddy Martinez Allqui, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2166
Petitioner:
EDDY ROBERTO MARTINEZ ALLQUI, MARIA DE LOS ANGELES CAIZA PILAMUNGA, M. A. M. C. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ingrid Cisneros Martinez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2154
Petitioner:
INGRID CISNEROS MARTINEZ and J D C.M.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Angel Martinez
as 24-2100
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANGEL ROBERTO MARTINEZ
Carlos Martinez-Sanchez, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1905
Petitioner:
CARLOS ANDRES MARTINEZ-SANCHEZ, GLORIA VERONICA BERMESO-FERNANDEZ, C. S. M.-B. and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd v. Notarc Port Investment LLC, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
LANDBRIDGE PORT SERVICES HONG KONG LTD
Defendant:
NOTARC PORT INVESTMENT LLC, NOTARC INVESTMENT PARTNERS LLC, COASTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LLC and others
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Notarc Port Investment LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Defendant:
Notarc Port Investment LLC, Notarc Investment Partners LLC, Coastal Infrastructure Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd. v. Zhang et al
as 1:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Landbridge Port Services (Hong Kong) Ltd.
Defendant:
Liang Zhang, Sinolam Consulting & Trading Holdings Pte. Ltd., Notarc Port Investment LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wilhelm v. Mirati Therapeutics, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01298
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Mirati Therapeutics, Inc., Faheem Hasnain, Charles Baum and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
