Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TUCKER v. PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES INC.
as 3:2023cv20623
Plaintiff:
TYSON TUCKER
Defendant:
PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Ballard v. Newmont Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
William Ballard
Defendant:
Newmont Corporation, Patrick G. Awuah, Jr., Gregory H. Boyce and others
RISIS v. RISIS et al
as 2:2023cv03429
Plaintiff:
DANIEL M. RISIS
Defendant:
MARGARITA RISIS, MARK RISIS, DAVID BOGOMOLNY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
DILLMAN v. PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC.
as 3:2023cv02456
Plaintiff:
SANDY DILLMAN
Defendant:
PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Finger v. Provention Bio, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00356
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Provention Bio, Inc., Ashleigh Palmer, Avery Catlin and others
PINN v. NATIONS AUTO PROTECTION, LLC et al
as 3:2022cv05810
Plaintiff:
KELLY PINN
Defendant:
NATIONS AUTO PROTECTION, LLC and PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
WATERMAN v. VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
VIDLER WATER RESOURCES, INC., MAXIM C. W. WEBB, DOROTHY A TAMIAN-PALMER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Wilhelm v. Vidler Water Resources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00631
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Vidler Water Resources, Inc., Maxim C.W. Webb, Dorothy Timian-Palmer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
