Cases 1 - 9 of 9
AGEWELL HOME HELPERS, INC. v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 2:2020cv01773
Defendant:
EUGENE SCALIA, CHERYL STANTON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff:
AGEWELL HOME HELPERS, INC. doing business as AGEWELL CAREGIVER SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
INTRA-NATIONAL HOME CARE, LLC et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al
as 2:2020cv01545
Defendant:
EUGENE SCALIA, CHERYL STANTON and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN HOME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC and INTRA-NATIONAL HOME CARE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ALLEGHENY VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. THE BOROUGH OF VERONA et al
as 2:2016cv01134
Plaintiff:
ALLEGHENY VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF VERONA, DAVID RICUPERO, SANDY DRABICKI-BELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
ALTZMAN v. HAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS
as 2:2014cv04895
Plaintiff:
STANTON ALTZMAN
Defendant:
HAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. STANTON et al
as 2:2013cv01603
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MARLENE L. STANTON and DJ'S 7141, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
JHANG et al v. KIM et al
as 2:2013cv06359
Plaintiff:
MYONG JA JHANG, KATHLEEN BANG WHAN CHANG and DONG IL KIM
Defendant:
PAUL DONG UK KIM, HAEKYONG KIM, KYUNG SOON KIM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. STANTON et al
as 2:2013cv01303
Plaintiff:
J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
MARLENE L. STANTON and 7101 FRANKSTOWN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
STANTON v. NATIONAL CREDIT WORKS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv05405
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER STANTON
Defendant:
NATIONAL CREDIT WORKS, INC. and GREGORY G. EMMINGER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
