Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
In Re: Request from Germany
as 1:2022mc00392
Petitioner:
Cook Deutschland GmbH
Respondent:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
TFORCE FREIGHT INC. v. KINDER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
as 2:2022cv04264
Plaintiff:
TFORCE FREIGHT INC.
Defendant:
KINDER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
TFORCE FREIGHT INC. v. KINDER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
as 1:2022cv04264
Plaintiff:
TFORCE FREIGHT INC.
Defendant:
KINDER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Affinity Empowering, Inc. v. Eurofins Scientific, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01843
Plaintiff:
Affinity Empowering, Inc.
Defendant:
Eurofins Scientific, Inc. and Clinical Enterprise, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nevro Corp. v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 1:2021mc00391
Plaintiff:
Nevro Corp.
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Perri v. Stephen E. Croskrey et al.
as 1:2021cv01423
Plaintiff:
Ryan Perri
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Christy Basco and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
BODYBIO, INC. v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2021cv15726
Plaintiff:
BODYBIO, INC.
Defendant:
Herbert Pierce, M.D. Krishna Doniparthi, HEMA PATEL-DONIPARTHI and others
Richard Greisberg v. Boston Scientific Corp
as 21-2364
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD GREISBERG
Defendant / Appellee:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP
Wendy Bahnsen, et al v. Boston Scientific Neuro
as 21-1250
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. WENDY A. BAHNSEN and CAROLINA H. FUENTES
Defendant / Appellant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
