Cases 101 - 110 of 235
GOUDELIS v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC.
as 2:2018cv06691
Plaintiff:
IRENE GOUDELIS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC. , KARCHER NORTH AMERICA, INC., JOHN DOE (1-100) and others
Cross_claimant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A, INC.
Cross_defendant:
JOHN DOE (1-100), KARCHER NORTH AMERICA, INC. and XYZ CORPORATION (1-100)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
CREW et al v. HOME DEPOT PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP #4106 et al
as 2:2018cv01245
Plaintiff:
DAVID CREW, SR. and RENEE CREW
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT PLYMOUTH TOWNSHIP #4106 and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LESTER v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.
as 2:2018cv02018
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A. INC.
Plaintiff:
ROGER LESTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DE LOS SANTOS NADAL et al v. HOME DEPOT DISTRIBUTION CENTER et al
as 5:2018cv00212
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DE LOS SANTOS NADAL, JR. and ROSI DE LOS SANTOS
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT DISTRIBUTION CENTER and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KURZINSKY v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2017cv05176
Plaintiff:
RYAN SCOTT KURZINSKY
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARTHUR v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2017cv04918
Plaintiff:
JAMIE ARTHUR
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KHOURI v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 5:2017cv04727
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE KHOURI
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and CRYSTAL SPRINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MALKO v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 3:2017cv08720
Plaintiff:
ERIC MALKO
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALKER v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 5:2017cv04162
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WALKER
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STEIN v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2017cv02862
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS STEIN
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
