Cases 111 - 120 of 148
ARNONE et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 5:2011cv04041
Plaintiff:
JACKIE ARNONE and ANTHONY ARNONE
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOFFA v. TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv03322
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MOFFA
Defendant:
TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES CO. LTD., TECHTRONIC INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC., ONE WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAUM et al v. THE BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00271
Plaintiff:
RANDY BAUM and PATRICIA BAUM
Defendant:
BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC. and HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YASICH et al v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2011cv00951
Plaintiff:
DONNA F. YASICH and MICHAEL YASICH
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIVERA v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv05362
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO RIVERA, JR.
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATCHISON-JOHNSON v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03414
Plaintiff:
GALE ATCHISON-JOHNSON
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and THE HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
TINNEY v. HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2010cv03044
Plaintiff:
JONATHON TINNEY
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT , HOME DEPOT, INC. , HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SLOTHOWER v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2010cv03013
Plaintiff:
DAVID SLOTHOWER
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hannah v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2010cv01293
Plaintiff:
Gina Hannah
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KRUG et al v. THE BRINKMANN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02891
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KRUG and NATIONAWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE
Defendant:
THE BRINKMANN CORPORATION and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
