Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Moore et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
as 3:2015cv07919
Plaintiff:
MARY MOORE , Donna Armstrong , Debra Blackwood and others
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRISCOLL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55392
Plaintiff:
GERARD D. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57408
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv46185
Plaintiff:
RICHARD DRISCOLL , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41287
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv38253
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL v. CATALINA ISLAND STEAMSHIP CO.
as 2:2011cv38254
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
CATALINA ISLAND STEAMSHIP CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
DRISCOLL et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2010cv83363
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE J. DRISCOLL and PATRICIA DRISCOLL
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. , THE CELOTEX CORP. , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRISCOLL et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83451
Plaintiff:
RONALD J. DRISCOLL and MARY DRISCOLL
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DRISCOLL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57166
Plaintiff:
GORDON P. DRISCOLL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
