Torts - Injury Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,552
DARLING et al v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC et al
as 2:2012cv00440
Plaintiff: MICHAEL DARLING and LUCY DARLING
Defendant: ZIMMER HOLDINGS INC and ZIMMER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DARLING, et al v. BAYER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv00053
Defendant: BAYER CORPORATION, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, BAYER PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff: TIARA DARLING and DAN DARLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ETHERDIGE v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67791
Plaintiff: JOHNNY H. ETHERDIGE
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67786
Plaintiff: JOE L. ALLEN
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67788
Plaintiff: KENNETH R. JONES
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARBIN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67790
Plaintiff: HUGH RAY HARBIN
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDANIEL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67787
Plaintiff: WILLIAM McDANIEL
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67785
Plaintiff: VENISE FAYE JONES
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BLACKWELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67789
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M. BLACKWELL
Defendant: 3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOODALL v. FARRELL LINES INC.
as 2:2011cv41059
Plaintiff: DARLING C WOODALL
Defendant: FARRELL LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?