Cases 31 - 40 of 93
HARA v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 2:2018cv05397
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY HARA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KORN-STEERMAN v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 2:2018cv04706
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
TINA KORN-STEERMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MUELLER v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE
as 2:2018cv04340
Plaintiff:
ANNELIESE MUELLER
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
GOODELL v. KOHL'S et al
as 3:2018cv13814
Defendant:
JOHN DOES (1-5), ABC COS. (1-5) and KOHL'S
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY GOODELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Zito v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01198
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Zito
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. , Kohl's Corporation and Kohl's York East
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUGHES et al v. KOHLS CORP et al
as 3:2018cv05761
Plaintiff:
MARY ANN HUGHES and JOEL HUGHES
Defendant:
KOHLS CORP , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
RASPA v. KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES et al
as 3:2018cv05107
Defendant:
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES , JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE RASPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCOTTO et al v. KOHL'S CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
DIANA L. SCOTTO and MICHAEL SCOTTO
Defendant:
KOHL'S CORPORATION and KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WEISSNER et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
as 1:2017cv13189
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
DORIS WEISSNER and MURRAY WEISSNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WEISS et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv13196
Plaintiff:
DORIS WEISS and MURRAY WEISS
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. , JOHN DOE, MARY DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
