Cases 51 - 60 of 102
ATKINS et al v. A C & S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv61741
Plaintiff:
CORDELL ATKINS and ETTIE JANE ATKINS
Defendant:
A C & S, INC , CELOTEX CORP , FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ATKINS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40192
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ATKINS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ATKINS v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv69636
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ATKINS
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF TERRI ATKINS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv02446
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF TERRI ATKINS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GONZALEZ et al v. ATKINS et al
as 2:2010cv01189
Plaintiff:
JORGE R. GONZALEZ and CHANTILLY GONZALEZ
Defendant:
BENJAMIN THOMAS ATKINS , "JOHN DOE 1-5, CENTRAL CAROLINA CARRIERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
ATKINS v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv61195
Plaintiff:
ZELMA P. ATKINS and ZELMA P. ATKINS
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION, THE BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, CAREY CANADA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS v. THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv60538
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR E ATKINS, JR
Defendant:
THE FLINTKOTE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
ATKINS v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31128
Plaintiff:
EDWARD C. ATKINS
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKINS v. W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
as 2:2010cv60642
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR E. ATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
W.R. GRACE & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
