Cases 51 - 60 of 65
SHEDRICK v. DREW
as 2:2010cv02374
Plaintiff:
ROMEO SHEDRICK
Defendant:
CARL DREW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63729
Plaintiff:
MARTHA SUE HERRON and DREW HERRON
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DREW v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31920
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. DREW
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DREW v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv30209
Plaintiff:
FRANK W. DREW
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC, A.H. BULL AND CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
HERRON v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv86639
Plaintiff:
DREW HERRON and MARTHA SUE HERRON
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DREW v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77393
Plaintiff:
CHARLES DREW and CHARLES DREW
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DREW et al v. GAF CORP et al
as 2:2009cv74655
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN DREW, SHERMAN DREW, SHERMAN DREW and others
Defendant:
GAF CORP, CAREY CANADA INC, CAREY CANADA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MUSIN et al v. MORRA et al
as 3:2009cv03382
Plaintiff:
ERIK M. MUSIN and SUSANNA MUSINA
Defendant:
TYLER DREW MORRA and RONALD MORRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Custins v. Duckett et al
as 1:2008cv00544
Plaintiff:
George Custins
Defendant:
Sherwin Drew Duckett and Duckett's Transport Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Drew v. Tutogen Medical, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv03554
Plaintiff:
Donna Drew
Defendant:
Tutogen Medical, Inc., BIOMEDICAL TISSUE SERVICES, LTD. and ZIMMER DENTAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
