Cases 51 - 58 of 58
LANCASTER v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv91913
Plaintiff:
RONALD LANCASTER and RONALD LANCASTER
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A P GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LANCASTER et al v. ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY et al
as 2:2008cv84559
Plaintiff:
SANKEY EDD LANCASTER, SANKEY EDD LANCASTER, SANKEY EDD LANCASTER and others
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON, BAYER CROPSCIENCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LANCASTER v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71988
Plaintiff:
ALMA LANCASTER
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
LANCASTER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65366
Plaintiff:
AVIS LANCASTER and AVIS LANCASTER
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LANCASTER v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv65367
Plaintiff:
SANDRA LANCASTER and SANDRA LANCASTER
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MAXWELL et al v. STIKELEATHER et al
as 5:2007cv05126
Plaintiff:
SARAH MAXWELL and CEDRIC MAXWELL
Defendant:
ANGELINE C. STIKELEATHER, BARBARA GOOD, KAREN L. ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
PFEIFER et al v. CANAS et al
as 1:2007cv04498
Plaintiff:
KELLY PFEIFER and KENNETH PFEIFER
Defendant:
OSCAR A. CANAS, JOHN DOE #1-5, LANCASTER FOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
DEE v. LANCASTER HOST RESORT & CONFERENCE CENTER
as 2:2007cv03838
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY DEE
Defendant:
LANCASTER HOST RESORT & CONFERENCE CENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
