Cases 71 - 80 of 390
CARR v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv08661
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ANN CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frazier et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00793
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff:
Kelly Frazier , Renee Anderson , Darlene Arden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR et al v. GUARINO SONS, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
SHELTON CARR and KARON CARR
Defendant:
GUARINO SONS, INC. and JAMES J. MONAGHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
as 2:2016cv05949
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL CARR
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. HI-TECH AUTO TRUCK SERVICE et al
as 1:2016cv05713
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARR
Defendant:
HI-TECH AUTO TRUCK SERVICE, JOHN DOE and ABC COMPANIES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CARR v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04456
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JAMES CARR
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04327
Plaintiff:
LEWIS CARR
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARR v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02655
Plaintiff:
MARGARET CARR
Defendant:
PFIZER INC. , PFIZER INTERNATIONAL LLC and J.B. ROERIG & COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIOTT v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
as 2:2015cv00829
Plaintiff:
CARRE A. ELLIOTT
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PUENTE v. CARR et al
as 2:2014cv02852
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PUENTE
Defendant:
ERWIN R. CARR and AGRI-MARK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
