Cases 71 - 80 of 122
MEDINA et al v. HARLEY DAVIDSON et al
as 2:2012cv02142
Plaintiff:
MILTON J. MEDINA and SUSAN SIEBERT
Defendant:
HARLEY DAVIDSON and BARB'S HARLEY DAVIDSON
Cross_claimant:
BARB'S HARLEY DAVIDSON
Cross_defendant:
HARLEY DAVIDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOTA-MEDINA et al v. CITY OF READING et al
as 5:2012cv00969
Plaintiff:
ISA MARIE MOTA-MEDINA , XAVIER SOSA , FREDDY PEREZ-GARABITO and others
Defendant:
CITY OF READING , READING POLICE DEPARTMENT and DANIEL CEDENO-ERAZO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP
as 3:2012cv01065
Plaintiff:
LAARNI P. MEDINA
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORP and FOSAMAX (ALENDRONATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MEDINA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55425
Plaintiff:
SOTERO M MEDINA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDINAS v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv45442
Plaintiff:
JUAN MEDINAS
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43676
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN M. MEDINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43115
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN N. MEDINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43476
Plaintiff:
IRINEO M. MEDINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ILLARRAZA-MEDINA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44899
Plaintiff:
REINALDO ILLARRAZA-MEDINA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MEDINA-CINTRON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv39609
Plaintiff:
JUAN MEDINA-CINTRON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
