Cases 1 - 7 of 7
B.R. et al v. Powdr-Woodward PA et al
as 4:2017cv01286
Plaintiff:
B.R. and Lisa Lombardo
Defendant:
Powdr-Woodward PA, Powdr Corp., Woodward Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.R. an infant by his mother and natural Guardian Ad Litem, CHAYA RICHTER et al v. DAMIANO et al
as 3:2017cv04343
Plaintiff:
A.R. an infant by his mother and natural Guardian Ad Litem, CHAYA RICHTER , B.R. an infant by his mother and natural Guardian Ad Litem, CHAYA RICHTER and CHAYA RICHTER
Defendant:
DEAN DAMIANO and DAMIANO CORPORATION OF EDGEWATER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SUTHERLAND et al v. B.R. FUNSTEN & CO. et al
as 2:2013cv60007
Plaintiff:
BARBARA SUTHERLAND and ANN SUTHERLAND
Defendant:
B.R. FUNSTEN & CO. , CBS CORPORATION , CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. and others
Respondent:
ITT CORPORATION and SYD CARPENTER MARINE CONTRACTOR INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SANDERS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60181
Plaintiff:
LANNY SANDERS and SANDRA JENSEN SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY , ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP, INC, ALLISON ENGINE COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDERS et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 2:2012cv60172
Plaintiff:
LANNY SANDERS and SANDRA JENSEN SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY , ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEGELEIN et al v. VT SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv00899
Plaintiff:
DANIEL J. HEGELEIN and SUSAN HEGELEIN
Defendant:
VT SYSTEMS, INC., LEE HOLDING COMPANY, VT LEE BOY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RHODES et al v. ACANDS INC et al
as 2:2009cv62734
Plaintiff:
HERMAN L. RHODES and BARBARA RHODES
Defendant:
ACANDS INC, AMERICAN ASBESTOS COMPANY, AMERICAN BILTRITE INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
