Cases 1 - 10 of 629
MULAWKA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01651
Plaintiff:
MARZENA MULAWKA
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MERCER COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRIDGER v. BORG-WARNER et al
as 2:2010cv79293
Plaintiff:
LINDA P. BRIDGER
Defendant:
BORG-WARNER , CHRYSLER CORPORATION , EATON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRODERICK et al v. ARMCO, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv62985
Plaintiff:
ENID BRODERICK, ARLETTE GILBERT, STEVEN BRODERICK and others
Defendant:
ARMCO, INC., ARMCO, INC., ABEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
LASSITER v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86164
Plaintiff:
CHARLENE LASSITER
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MESSICK v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86170
Plaintiff:
MARTHA MESSICK
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOSKINS v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86157
Plaintiff:
JAMES HOSKINS
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALBRIGHT v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86136
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALBRIGHT
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
MILLER v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86171
Plaintiff:
LORING MILLER
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
READY v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86181
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY READY
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
TERRELL v. ABNEY MILLS et al
as 2:2008cv86187
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE TERRELL
Defendant:
ABNEY MILLS, A.W. CHESTERTON, ADVANCE AUTO PARTS STORE and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
