Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CARTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv02843
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA G. CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2020cv13408
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA LP
Plaintiff:
BILLY G. CARTER
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv57401
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G CARTER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER, SR v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
as 2:2011cv51318
Plaintiff:
FREDRICK G. CARTER, SR
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER et al v. AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC. et al
as 2:2011cv32850
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G. CARTER and CREIGHTON E. MILLER
Defendant:
AMERICAN EXPORT LINES INC. , FARRELL LINES INC. , GRACE LINES/PRUDENTIAL LINES and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv32852
Plaintiff:
ROBERT G CARTER
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER v. A-C PRODUCT LAIBILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57110
Plaintiff:
WALTER G CARTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LAIBILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CARTER v. ALLIEDSIGNAL et al
as 2:2009cv68931
Plaintiff:
NORMAN G. CARTER and NORMAN G. CARTER
Defendant:
ALLIEDSIGNAL, ALLIEDSIGNAL, GARLOCK, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
