Cases 1 - 10 of 12
CARTER v. PFIZER, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv06439
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATE CARTER
Defendant:
PFIZER, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59055
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CARTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41493
Plaintiff:
JAMES W. CARTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv37525
Plaintiff:
JAMES W CARTER, SR and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CARTER v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv66383
Defendant:
3M, COOPER INDUSTRIES LLC, GOODRICH CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES E CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CARTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40493
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CARTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CARTER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv38065
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. CARTER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A. P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv64270
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD CARTER
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31544
Plaintiff:
JAMES L. CARTER
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CARTER v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71208
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. CARTER
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
