Cases 1 - 10 of 20
LM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv02536
Plaintiff:
LM GENERAL INSURANCE CO.
Defendant:
LAWRENCE M SCOTT, RYDER TRUCK RENTAL LTD. and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Property Damage
SCOTT v. ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV et al
as 2:2018cv01231
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. SCOTT
Defendant:
ANHEUSER-BUSCH INBEV SA/NV and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV et al
as 3:2018cv01782
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Scott
Defendant:
Anheuser-Busch Inbev SA/NV and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PILLOW et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2013cv00591
Plaintiff:
FRANK PILLOW , PERRY HARNETT and TONY M. SCOTT
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SCOTT v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68349
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BOYD v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37130
Plaintiff:
M SCOTT BOYD
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT et al v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 5:2011cv39770
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT
Petitioner:
CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT et al v. ACANDS, INC.
as 5:2011cv39769
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT and CREIGHTON E MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 5:2011cv39771
Plaintiff:
CHARLES M. SCOTT
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SCOTT et al v. THE CELOTEX CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv79050
Plaintiff:
WARREN DOUGLAS SCOTT and LAVERNE M. SCOTT
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORP., ARMSTRONG WORLD IND., INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
