Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rory Walsh v. USA, et al
as 15-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY M. WALSH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rory Walsh v. USA, et al
as 13-4441
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY M. WALSH
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, JERRY D. HUMBLE and others
Walsh et al v. Pfizer Inc.
as 3:2013cv02561
Plaintiff:
Diane M. Walsh and William E. Walsh
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALSH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv49116
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. WALSH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Rory Walsh, et al v. Robert Krantz, et al
as 11-1526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY M. WALSH, individually; and as Natural Guardian of C.R.W., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT KRANTZ
Appellant:
S. J. W.
Rory Walsh v. Robert Krantz, et al
as 10-1217
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY M. WALSH, individually and as Natural Guardian of C.R.W., a minor
Defendant - Appellee:
DALLASTOWN 10-1217 DEFENDANTS
WALSH et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv64094
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. WALSH, JOHN M. WALSH, JOHN M. WALSH and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED, ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., CROWN CORK AND SEAL CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Rory Walsh v. USA, et al
as 08-2970
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RORY M. WALSH
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. BYRON, THOMAS F. GHORMLEY, JERRY D. HUMBLE and others
WALSH et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv68008
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. WALSH and CATHERINE WALSH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG CORK COMPA, A.P. GREEN REFRACTORIES CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bunn v. Walsh et al
as 3:2007cv01467
Plaintiff:
Brian Bunn
Defendant:
John M. Walsh and Andrew M. Miszler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
