Cases 1 - 8 of 8
CAMPBELL v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv15630
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY T. CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv06015
Plaintiff:
JOAN CAMPBELL and RICHARD T. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. , JOHNSON & JOHNSON , SECANT MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56949
Plaintiff:
ROBERT T. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAMPBELL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37431
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP T. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAMPBELL et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv61707
Plaintiff:
ROYCE T. CAMPBELL and ELEANOR B. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
AC&S, INC. , CELOTEX CORP. , FIBREBOARD CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CAMPBELL et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv90945
Plaintiff:
JOHN T. CAMPBELL, JOHN T. CAMPBELL, PATRICIA M. CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, CERRO WIRE & CABLE CO., INC., CERRO WIRE & CABLE CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CAMPBELL et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64318
Plaintiff:
VIRGINIA CAMPBELL, VIRGINIA CAMPBELL, VIRGINIA CAMPBELL and others
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
CAMPBELL v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv81449
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
