Cases 91 - 100 of 488
MAYES v. COUNTY OF BURLINGTON et al
as 1:2021cv12151
Defendant:
JANE DOE NURSE 2, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, OFFICER BARNES and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MAYES
3Rd Party Defendant:
CFG HEALTH SYSTEMS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAJO v. AGRI-INDUSTRIES et al
as 1:2021cv10423
Defendant:
NURSE PRACTITIONER JANE DOE 1, SUSAN SCARBOROUGH, AGRI-INDUSTRIES and others
Plaintiff:
MELSI PAJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. MILLER et al
as 2:2021cv09404
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE JACKSON
Defendant:
JANE DOES, MARCUS O. HICKS, DR. LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. ROBINSON et al
as 1:2021cv05200
Plaintiff:
LUIS GARCIA
Defendant:
OFFICER JEFFREY ROBINSON and JOHN DOES 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ECKERT v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv05244
Defendant:
OFFICER RYAN DEAR, WARDEN DAVID KELSEY, COUNTY OF ATLANTIC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ECKERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARLTON v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY et al
as 1:2021cv05259
Defendant:
COUNTY OF ATLANTIC, WARDEN DAVID KELSEY, SERGEANT MICHAEL MORRISSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JAMEL CARLTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. KELLEY et al
as 3:2021cv04565
Defendant:
NURSE NEAL WEST, C.O.R. G. KELLEY, C.O.R. W. GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE et al
as 2:2021cv04257
Defendant:
UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE 1 TO 5 and UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE
Plaintiff:
DAVID WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IVANCICH v. THE COUNTY OF UNION, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv04028
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVID IVANCICH
Defendant:
RONALD L CHARLES, JOHN DOE #1-10, COUNTY OF UNION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DALAL v. KRAKORA et al
as 2:2021cv03439
Plaintiff:
AAKASH DALAL
Defendant:
JEAN M. HARTMANN, MATTHEW J. ASTORE, JOSEPH E. KRAKORA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
