Cases 151 - 160 of 18,969
RIZK v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2024cv05575
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BRADLEY v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05126
Petitioner:
LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SIRIANI v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOSEPH SIRIANI
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, MARC SIRE, U.C.H.C. UNIVERSITY CORR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. STALLER et al
as 3:2024cv04033
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
BRANDEN STALLER, MD AMY EMRICH, ANTHONY GANGI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILTON v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv04983
Petitioner:
SAMUELS MILTON
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BUENO v. R. THOMPSON (FCI FORT DIX)
as 1:2024cv00912
Petitioner:
ALEX IZQUIERDO BUENO
Respondent:
R. THOMPSON (FCI FORT DIX)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SWONTEK v. WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv00982
Petitioner:
BRIAN SWONTEK
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TORRES v. JOHN DOE 1-3
as 1:2024cv04897
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. TORRES
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv04853
Petitioner:
SPENCER YOUNG
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GILYARD v. OFFICER FLEMMING et al
as 2:2024cv00892
Plaintiff:
GERALD MARQUIESE GILYARD
Defendant:
OFFICER FLEMMING and ESSEX COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
