Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Jones v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00396
Plaintiff:
Terence A. Jones
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Figuerelle, Craig Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Markell et al
as 1:2010cv00250
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Jack A. Markell, Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shockley v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00900
Petitioner:
Sylvester Shockley
Respondent:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. National Enquirer et al
as 1:2009cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches and Joshua David Duhamel
Defendant:
National Enquirer doing business as American Media Inc., Star Magazine, Reginald Fitz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Rogers et al
as 1:2008cv00603
Plaintiff:
Ronald F. Brooks
Defendant:
Dale Rogers and Rick Kearney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Johnson et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00539
Plaintiff:
John C. Johnson, William Gregory, Daymien J. Roberts and others
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crump v. Danberg et al
as 1:2008cv00506
Plaintiff:
Ernest A. Crump, Jr.
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Rick Kearney, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2008cv00004
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Ruth Ann Minner, Carl C. Danberg, Correctional Medical Services Inc. et al. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Eaton v. Danberg et al
as 1:2007cv00849
Plaintiff:
Robert Edward Eaton
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Thomas Carroll, Rick Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoffman v. Danburg et al
as 1:2007cv00261
Plaintiff:
Michael Kevin Hoffman
Defendant:
Carl Danburg, Thomas Carol, Correctional Medical Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
