Cases 11 - 20 of 137
GLOVER v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv20714
Plaintiff:
DONALD ANTHONY GLOVER
Defendant:
DAVID S. OWENS, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv20161
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, MEDICAL DEPT. STAFF, NURSE NANCY GORDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILSON v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2021cv20147
Plaintiff:
RAHEEN D. WILSON, SR.
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES and WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARTLEY v. WARREN
as 1:2021cv19312
Plaintiff:
EUGENE B. BARTLEY, SR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IACONE v. NORTHERN STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2021cv17187
Plaintiff:
KENNETH V. IACONE, SR.
Defendant:
NORTHERN STATE PRISON MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, NORTHERN STATE PRISON MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT, ADMINISTRATIONS DEPARTMENT OF NORTHERN STATE PRISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINTER v. ROANE
as 1:2021cv17537
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L. MINTER, SR.
Defendant:
OFFICER GEORGE ROANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv13805
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS BROWN
Defendant:
JONATHAN L. YOUNG, SR., DAVID S. OWEN, JR., KAREN TAYLOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE v. NARDELLI et al
as 1:2021cv09723
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFFERY POMERANTE and ERIN NARDELLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARCHIE et al v. CHETIRKIN et al
as 1:2021cv01095
Plaintiff:
SHAWN ARCHIE, SR., ALUJAMA SHAKUR, KAREEM BLOCKER and others
Defendant:
ROBERT CHETIRKIN, SOUTHERN STATE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, NAME UNKNOWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEMBY v. COUNTY OF CAMDEN et al
as 1:2020cv13892
Defendant:
EDWARD T. MCDONNELL, COUNTY OF CAMDEN, CITY OF CAMDEN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMOR J. DEMBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
