Cases 21 - 30 of 329
BROWN v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv01350
Petitioner:
GARY BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE M. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WASHINGTON v. ARAMARK CORP. et al
as 1:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
JAMALL WASHINGTON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORP., CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LANE, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. KELLY et al
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN MIKE KELLY, SGT. LISA JOHNSON, DON GEIGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2023cv00605
Petitioner:
DAVID BROWN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, U.S. PROBATION OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. NUESTEADUR et al
as 1:2022cv06492
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
JUDGE NUESTEADUR, JUDGE MICHAEL DONIO, JUDGE JAMES E. ISMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2022cv06359
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2022cv06240
Plaintiff:
DARNELL BROWN
Defendant:
HUDSON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CAMDEN et al
as 1:2022cv05939
Plaintiff:
TROY A. BROWN
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN and COUNTY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. FALVEY et al
as 3:2022cv05861
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
JOHN FALVEY, LT . EIGENRAUNCH, JAMES RUSSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WHITE et al
as 1:2022cv05458
Plaintiff:
MR. MICHAEL D. BROWN
Defendant:
DR. RICHARD WHITE and DR. PETER PAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
