Cases 31 - 40 of 159
DURHAM v. JOHN OR JANE DOE 1-7 et al
as 3:2020cv09601
Defendant:
S. PATTERSON, J. PIERCE, JOHN OR JANE DOE 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAGLIAROLI v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv21505
Defendant:
PROVIDER JOY CAMARLLIO, PROVIDER MS. JACKSON, JOHN AND JANE DOE(S) 1 TO 5 and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH PAGLIAROLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRYAN v. OCEAN COUNTY et al
as 3:2019cv16287
Defendant:
SANDRA J. MUELLER, COUNTY OF OCEAN, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-20 and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L BRYAN, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. HICKS et al
as 3:2019cv14803
Defendant:
MARCUS O. HICKS, WILLIE BONDS, LUZ TORRES and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN E. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZEMPLE v. RUTGERS UNIVERSITY et al
as 3:2019cv12746
Defendant:
WILLIE BONDS, REGISTER SCO SAUNDERS, BEVERLY HASTINGS and others
Plaintiff:
CRAIG FRANCIS SZEMPLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. GUARDUCCI et al
as 2:2019cv08735
Defendant:
OFFICER A. SOSA, R. SCHARPRICK, D. BURK and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER et al
as 3:2019cv07610
Defendant:
KENNETH GLOVER, DR. GLENN FERGUSON, LINDA ELIAS and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BYRD v. FINLEY et al
as 3:2019cv06879
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT MARK GILLEN, THE DAILY JORNAL VINELAND NEW JERSEY, DETECTIVE MICHAEL FRANSKO and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRACEY v. BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00432
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JANE DOE, 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
BERNARD BRACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BONDS et al
as 1:2018cv13253
Plaintiff:
DAMON WILLIAMS
Defendant:
OFC. JOHN DOE, SGT. MILELTTA, WILLIE BONDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
