Cases 61 - 70 of 75
Buchanan v. Biden et al
as 1:2010cv00727
Plaintiff:
David J. Buchanan
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, III, William A. Wallace, Nolt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rainier v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2010cv00498
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey M. Rainier, Sr.
Defendant:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl Danberg, Richard Kearney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Beckles et al
as 1:2010cv00362
Plaintiff:
Gregory F. Robinson
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Perry Phelps, Scaroborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gadson v. Grondolsky et al
as 1:2009cv00915
Plaintiff:
Robert V. Gadson
Defendant:
Jeff Grondolsky, Michael K. Loucks, Mark J. Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel v. Morgan et al
as 1:2009cv00566
Plaintiff:
Karl B. Manuel
Defendant:
Philip Morgan, Mark Emig and Phillip Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Read v. Deloy et al
as 1:2009cv00539
Petitioner:
Mark J. Read
Respondent:
Michael E. Deloy and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franklin v. McMahans
as 1:2009cv00323
Plaintiff:
Mark Franklin
Defendant:
Michael McMahans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Cochran et al
as 1:2009cv00132
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Johnnie L. Cochran, Jr., Ulysses Torey, Jose Ernesto Medellin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Morgan et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff:
Albert James Brown
Defendant:
Phil Morgan, Mark Emig, Carl Danberg and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Woods v. Grant et al
as 1:2008cv00396
Plaintiff:
Bernard F Woods
Defendant:
Brian Grant, Mark Grajewski and Terry Oconnor
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
