Cases 61 - 70 of 1,601
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2023cv20485
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, A. GANGI, C. SEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20134
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CRUZ v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2023cv16879
Plaintiff:
RAMOS M. CRUZ
Defendant:
WARDEN, OFFICER PETTY, OFFICER J.C. DARDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DOE
as 1:2023cv15966
Plaintiff:
JAMAR WALKER
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SALAHUDDIN v. PLUMERI JR et al
as 2:2023cv15725
Plaintiff:
BILAL SALAHUDDIN
Defendant:
SAMUEL J. PLUMERI JR, ATHONY G PEGUES and JOHN AND JANE DOE 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURHAM v. NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON et al
as 3:2023cv12415
Petitioner:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE, ANTHONY GANGI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GEORGES v. GALDHI et al
as 2:2023cv05168
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
BALAZS GALDHI, JOSEPHINE P. FRIMPONG, NOELLE ZUENA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
VILLAFANA v. CHARLES et al
as 2:2023cv04374
Plaintiff:
YASIN VILLAFANA
Defendant:
RONALD L. CHARLES, WATSON JR., CORNICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. NWACHUKWU et al
as 3:2023cv04240
Plaintiff:
E-SHAUN JONES
Defendant:
IHUOMA NWACHUKWU, ABU AHSAN, SCO PAZAK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAGAN-ADORNO v. KUHN et al
as 2:2023cv04118
Plaintiff:
JOSUE PAGAN-ADORNO
Defendant:
VICTORIA KUHN, JOHN DOE and DR. JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
