Cases 71 - 80 of 253
LOPEZ v. SIMPKINS et al
as 1:2019cv11711
Defendant:
CAPTAIN LIBER, JOHN DOES 1-10, SERGEANT BORKOWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. GUARDUCCI et al
as 2:2019cv08735
Defendant:
OFFICER A. SOSA, R. SCHARPRICK, D. BURK and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOE v. ANN KLEIN FORENSIC CENTER et al
as 3:2019cv07610
Defendant:
KENNETH GLOVER, DR. GLENN FERGUSON, LINDA ELIAS and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BELOUS v. GANNON, et al
as 2:2019cv06186
Defendant:
ILYA BELOUS, Sergeant JOHN DOE DAVIDSECK, Dr. JOHN DOE AND NURSES JANE DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BYRD v. FINLEY et al
as 3:2019cv06879
Defendant:
SPECIAL AGENT MARK GILLEN, THE DAILY JORNAL VINELAND NEW JERSEY, DETECTIVE MICHAEL FRANSKO and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COUNTY OF SALEM et al
as 1:2019cv01166
Defendant:
CAPTAIN LIBER, OFFICER WHITE, JOHN CUZZUPE and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN P. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRACEY v. BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2019cv00432
Defendant:
COUNTY OF BURLINGTON COUNTY, BURLINGTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JANE DOE, 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
BERNARD BRACEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 3:2019cv00160
Defendant:
SHERIFF SHAUN E GOLDEN, JOHN 1 - 10 DOES, KABEERUDDIN S. HASHMI and others
Plaintiff:
QAWEE ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. SAMUAH et al
as 3:2018cv16284
Defendant:
OLIVIA SAMUAH, DOCTOR JOHN MOE TWO, RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PUTNEY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv15716
Defendant:
SCO. CLARK, SGT. GILBERT, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PUTNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
