Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 81 - 90 of 19,161
MENDOZA-GARCIA v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv08349
Respondent: WARDEN
Petitioner: LUCIANO MENDOZA-GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08347
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv08354
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LENTZ v. DEDONNO et al
as 3:2024cv08396
Plaintiff: TREY LENTZ
Defendant: RYAN DILL and LOUIS DEDONNO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIAMO v. THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv08322
Respondent: WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Petitioner: MICHAEL GIANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CARSTARPHEN v. DAVIS
as 1:2024cv08329
Respondent: BRUCE DAVIS
Petitioner: FENTON J. CARSTARPHEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BARTEE v. GIBSON et al
as 1:2024cv08326
Defendant: THE COUNTY OF CAPE MAY, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ALJ GIBSON and others
Plaintiff: RAYMOND LAMONT BARTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OBREGON-CALCEDO v. THOMPSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv08320
Petitioner: DIEGO E. OBREGON-CALCEDO
Respondent: WARDEN MRS. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
PIEPER v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv08265
Petitioner: DARREN PIEPER
Respondent: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOLMES v. KUHN et al
as 2:2024cv08315
Plaintiff: TERENCE O. HOLMES
Defendant: VICTORIA L. KUHN, ESQ., ORTIZ, SANTANA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?