Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DEVAULT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DEVAULT
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, OSCAR AVILES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANT v. WARREN et al
as 1:2021cv17766
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWARD GANT, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES WARREN, DR. NEAL JONES and EVELYN OLSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KORNHAUSER v. ORTIZ et al
as 1:2019cv18373
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ and FREDERICK OLSEN
Petitioner:
JULIUS KORNHAUSER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEWIS v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2019cv17275
Defendant:
HEAD OF MEDICAL, M. FISHER, DAVID J. STEEL and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRILEY v. SMIHAL et al
as 1:2018cv13889
Defendant:
MR. OLSEN, MS. SMIHAL, MR. ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
JAY BONANZA BRILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BRILEY v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2016cv05571
Petitioner:
JAY BONANZA BRILEY
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH , KANE , ORTIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROUDABUSH, JR. v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2016cv00251
Plaintiff:
JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR.
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR FOR THE NORTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUDABUSH v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2015cv05944
Petitioner:
JAMES L. ROUDABUSH, JR.
Respondent:
J. HOLLINGSWORTH , WASOM , GOBOAVICH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BARNES v. BROYLES et al
as 1:2013cv00737
Plaintiff:
TUERE BARNES
Defendant:
B.O.P OFFICER BROYLES, FOOD SERVICE ADMINISTRATOR, OFFICER KWARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. USA et al
as 1:2012cv07276
Plaintiff:
Loren Henderson
Defendant:
USA, DONNA ZICKFOOSE, FNU Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
