Cases 1 - 10 of 30
PIERCE v. SMYCZEK et al
as 2:2024cv09499
Defendant:
DR. HERBERT SMYCZEK, MAXIM CASAS and MICHAEL DANTIEO
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv07935
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and ROBERT CHETIRKIN
Petitioner:
MARTIN D. PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PIERCE v. AVILES
as 2:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
MAURICE PIERCE
Defendant:
OSCAR AVILES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUNDY v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2021cv20259
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE BUNDY
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, RYAN AUBEROWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURHAM v. JOHN OR JANE DOE 1-7 et al
as 3:2020cv09601
Defendant:
S. PATTERSON, J. PIERCE, JOHN OR JANE DOE 1-7 and others
Plaintiff:
TREMAYNE DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRYANT v. TRAENDLY et al
as 3:2019cv04758
Defendant:
TANIA LARKIN, NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE BOARD and MICHAEL TRAENDLY
Plaintiff:
PIERCE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HESLOP v. DANIELS et al
as 3:2018cv01503
Plaintiff:
NEVEL HESLOP
Defendant:
B. DANIELS and PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANTONI v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 1:2017cv07893
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CANTONI
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, JOHN BARRY, BRAD PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv06898
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVIS
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY L. LANIGAN, VICTOR TAPIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2017cv02961
Petitioner:
BRYANT BANKS, SR.
Respondent:
DAVID PIERCE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
