Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DIBIASE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2021cv02679
Defendant:
OFFICER ROWE, WARDEN RICHARD T. SMITH, ASSISTANT WARDEN CHARLES WARREN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL R. DIBIASE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLINGSWORTH v. TIMMONS et al
as 1:2020cv09930
Defendant:
WALTER RAND TRANSPORTATION CENTER, SGT. ROWE, P/O MCCAUS and others
Plaintiff:
MARK HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWE v. ORTIZ
as 1:2019cv17371
Respondent:
WARDEN DAVID E. ORTIZ
Petitioner:
BRIAN LAKEITH ROWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GRAHAM v. ROWE et al
as 1:2019cv06757
Defendant:
MARK ROWE, VINELAND MUNICIPAL COURT and VINELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL GRAHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. SESSIONS, ET AL.,
as 3:2017cv05475
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, THOMAS KANE, CARVAJAL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2016cv02586
Plaintiff:
LEMONT LOVE
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, NEW BRUNSWICK POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIDDLESEX COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STEELE v. LISZCZAK et al
as 3:2014cv07389
Plaintiff:
YUSEF STEELE
Defendant:
GREGORY LISZCZAK, MICHAEL COPPOLA, SEAN FOXE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWE v. NELSON et al
as 1:2013cv04971
Petitioner:
DERIC ROWE
Respondent:
KENNETH NELSON and JOHN HOFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ALI v. THOMAS
as 1:2010cv00554
Petitioner:
ROWE ALI
Respondent:
SEAN THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROWE v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2010cv00023
Petitioner:
DAVID ROWE
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DONNA ZICKEFOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
