Cases 1 - 10 of 12
LEWIS v. SESSIONS, ET AL.,
as 3:2017cv05475
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant:
JEFF SESSIONS, THOMAS KANE, CARVAJAL, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv03668
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JEFF SESSIONS , DAVID ORTIZ , THOMAS KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MITCHELL v. BERDWIK, et als
as 2:2016cv09159
Petitioner:
MARCELLUS MITCHELL
Respondent:
RICHARD H. BERDWIK, MICHAEL TOLERICO, RONALD D. WIGLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SAISI v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2016cv05064
Plaintiff:
HEMMINGWAY MUKORA SAISI
Defendant:
CAROLYN MURRAY, MICHAEL MARUCCI, MICHAEL A. PETROLLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE et al
as 2:2016cv03849
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE ELLIS
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, REBECCA FISHER, OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENDERS OF ESSEX COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FRAZIER v. ALVARADO et al
as 2:2013cv05177
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY FRAZIER
Defendant:
CARLOS ALVARADO, CORY BOOKER, ACOCELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv02215
Petitioner:
BARRY BROWN
Respondent:
PAUL LAGANA and CAROLYN MURRAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCLAUREN v. LAGANA et al
as 2:2013cv00145
Petitioner:
LEROY MCLAUREN
Respondent:
PAUL K. LAGANA and CAROLYN A. MURRATY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STACKHOUSE v. DOW et al
as 2:2011cv07554
Plaintiff:
STACK STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
PAULA T. DOW, CAROLYN A. MURRAY, LINDA CHILDSWIFT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ZARTIN v. BALIGA et al
as 2:2011cv06929
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH T. ZARTIN
Defendant:
RAVI BALIGA, CAROLYN FARRALES, LUNA HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
