Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Broomer, Sr. v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00311
Petitioner:
Donald Broomer, Sr.
Respondent:
Brian Emig and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Emig et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Petitioner:
Davon M. Gordon, Sr.
Respondent:
Warden Brian Emig and The Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. DeMatteis et al
as 1:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
Sean M. Gray, Sr.
Defendant:
Claire DeMatteis, Dr. Erskins, Michael Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles E. Duffy, Sr. v. Truman Mears et al
as 1:2021cv01418
Petitioner:
Charles E. Duffy, Sr.
Respondent:
Truman Mears and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. May et al
as 1:2021cv01192
Petitioner:
Timothy D. Jones, Shakir A. Jones, Shakir Taqi Ahmad and others
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dorazio v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00408
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Kristin H. Scott, Delaware DOC and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny L. Dorazio, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shabazz v. Pepper Hamilton, LLP et al
as 1:2020cv01778
Defendant:
Frank Pennel, Pierce, Ron Hosterman and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Haqq Shabazz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. May et al
as 1:2020cv00418
Defendant:
Robert May, Claire DeMatteis and Jill Mosser
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Duffy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duffy v. Tease et al
as 1:2019cv01770
Defendant:
Ms. Kitchen, Karl Haller, Claud Tease and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Duffy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins, Sr. v. State Of Delaware et al
as 1:2019cv00558
Defendant:
Kathleen Jennings, Lindsey M. Taylor, State Of Delaware and others
Plaintiff:
Nakia Usef Wiggins, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
