Cases 1 - 10 of 123
SAUNDERS v. SANNA et al
as 3:2016cv06560
Plaintiff:
TERRY L. SAUNDERS
Defendant:
RONALD J. SANNA, AARON AUCLAIR, JOHN WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Aviles et al
as 2:2013cv06101
Petitioner:
CARLOS MENDEZ
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, Scott A. Weber, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LOPEZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2013cv03106
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN RAMOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BOWEN v. AVILES et al
as 2:2013cv01862
Petitioner:
RUPERT BOWEN
Respondent:
OSCAR AVILES, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LAWRENCE v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04527
Petitioner:
LLOYD G. LAWRENCE
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2012cv04022
Petitioner:
MATTHEW J. MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, MONMOUTH COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY FREEHOLD, NEW JERSEY, SCOTT A. WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FOFANA v. HENDRICKS et al
as 2:2012cv03042
Petitioner:
FODAY FOFANA
Respondent:
ROY HENDRICKS, SCOTT WEBER, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COUTARD v. WOOD et al
as 3:2012cv02256
Petitioner:
RICHARD PERPETUA COUTARD
Respondent:
E. WOOD, MONMOUTH COUNT CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, SCOTT A. WEBER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHRISTIE v. ELWOOD et al
as 3:2011cv07070
Petitioner:
HAROLD CHRISTIE
Respondent:
BRIAN ELWOOD, SCOTT A. WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ABBAS v. WEBER et al
as 2:2011cv06118
Petitioner:
BHATTI ABBAS
Respondent:
SCOTT WEBER, JOHN T. MORTON, JANET NAPOLITANO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
