Cases 21 - 30 of 110
HENNIGHAN et al v. NEW JERSEY SPINE CENTER et al
as 2:2018cv17582
Plaintiff:
BARBARA HENNIGHAN and JOSEPH HENNIGHAN
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY SPINE CENTER, JOHN DOE 1-10, JANE DOE, RN 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002
Magella Medical Associates Billing Inc et al v. Aetna Health Inc et al
as 2:2018cv03710
Defendant:
AETNA HEALTH INC and AETNA INC.
Plaintiff:
Pediatrix Medical Services Inc and Magella Medical Associates Billing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
ESSEX SURGICAL, LLC v. AETNA, INC et al
as 2:2018cv10041
Plaintiff:
ESSEX SURGICAL, LLC
Defendant:
AETNA, INC and PREFERRED MEDICAL CLAIM SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
SHAKOV v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv08804
Defendant:
AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY , AETNA, INC. , JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
EMIL SHAKOV, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SHAH v. AETNA, INC.
as 1:2018cv05660
Plaintiff:
RAHUL SHAH, M.D.
Defendant:
AETNA, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv05663
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSITY SPINE CENTER
Defendant:
AETNA, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IGEA BRAIN & SPINE, P.A. v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04985
Plaintiff:
IGEA BRAIN & SPINE, P.A.
Defendant:
AETNA, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
IGEA BRAIN & SPINE, P.A. v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04978
Plaintiff:
IGEA BRAIN & SPINE, P.A.
Defendant:
AETNA, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RAHUL SHAH, M.D. et al v. AETNA, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv04795
Plaintiff:
RAHUL SHAH, M.D. and CHRISTIAN BRENNER, PA-C
Defendant:
AETNA, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SHAH et al v. AETNA INC. et al
as 1:2018cv04806
Plaintiff:
RAHUL SHAH, M.D. and CHRISTIAN BRENNER, PA-C
Defendant:
AETNA INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
