Cases 21 - 28 of 28
PFEIFER v. WAWA, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00497
Plaintiff:
GREG PFEIFER
Defendant:
WAWA, INC. , RETIREMENT PLANS COMMITTEE OF WAWA, INC. , RICHARD D. WOOD, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. et al v. ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2014cv07233
Plaintiff:
UNITED HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC. , BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF FLORIDA, INC. , NORIDIAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Defendant:
ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC. , ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. , AMERICAN MEDICAL SOLUTIONS HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
WOOD v. RENEWAL, INC.
as 2:2013cv00757
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WOOD
Defendant:
RENEWAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
WOODS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv07015
Plaintiff:
CALVIN WOODS , HENRIETTA SEARS WOODS , DONALD SMITH and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE , NFL PROPERTIES, LLC , BUCCANNEERS LIMITED PARTNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relation
WOOD v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2012cv03301
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN WOOD
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHOPMEN'S LOCAL 527 PENSION FUND v. UNIVERSAL WELDING, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01576
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHOPMEN'S LOCAL 527 PENSION FUND
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL WELDING, INC., THOMAS WOODS and CAROL WOODS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
YOUNG v. SMITH et al
as 2:2009cv03730
Plaintiff:
DANIEL F. YOUNG
Defendant:
DAVID C. SMITH, AMERICA'S SALES AGENCY, INC. and WILLIAM WOODS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Hartman et al
as 1:2008cv02248
Plaintiff:
James Hartman, Wilson Eshbach, Laborers Union Local 1174 Health and Welfare Fund and others
Defendant:
Specialty Wood Working
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
