Cases 41 - 50 of 2,131
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE BENEFIT PENSION FUND et al v. J.D. FEDELE CONSTRUCTION DEMOLITION, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04339
Plaintiff:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE BENEFIT PENSION FUND, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS OF EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA AND DELAWARE APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
J.D. FEDELE CONSTRUCTION DEMOLITION, INC. and HERMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUSTEES OF THE PENSION FUND FOR NURSING HOME AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PHILADELPHIA VICINITY v. MAJESTIC OAKS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER
as 2:2023cv04225
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE PENSION FUND FOR NURSING HOME AND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES PHILADELPHIA VICINITY
Defendant:
MAJESTIC OAKS REHABILITATION AND NURSING CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. MIKERI GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv04107
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN, TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY EDUCATIONAL PLAN and others
Defendant:
MIKERI GROUP, INC. and NAYAD CASTALDO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND v. PRINCETON CARE CENTER et al
as 2:2023cv21403
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
PRINCETON CARE CENTER, PRINCETON NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., GAIL BOGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND v. PRINCETON CARE CENTER et al
as 3:2023cv21403
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTH CARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
PRINCETON CARE CENTER, PRINCETON NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, INC., GAIL BOGNER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 PENSION FUND et al v. BEAN, INC.
as 2:2023cv04097
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 WELFARE FUND and TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 ANNUITY FUND
Defendant:
BEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 PENSION FUND et al v. BEAN, INC.
as 5:2023cv04097
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 WELFARE FUND and TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS LOCAL NO. 1174 ANNUITY FUND
Defendant:
BEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 WELFARE FUND et al v. ZARAGOZA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03976
Plaintiff:
STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 WELFARE FUND, STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 PENSION FUND, STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Defendant:
ZARAGOZA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC and BRAD BARNEYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 WELFARE FUND et al v. ZARAGOZA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv03976
Plaintiff:
STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 WELFARE FUND, STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 PENSION FUND, STEAMFITTERS UNION, LOCAL 420 SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN and others
Defendant:
ZARAGOZA BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION, LLC and BRAD BARNEYS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND v. CORNELL HALL CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER
as 2:2023cv21108
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT 1199J, NEW JERSEY HEALTHCARE EMPLOYERS PENSION FUND
Defendant:
CORNELL HALL CARE & REHABILITATION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
