Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
HAMMOND et al v. SUBURBAN WASTE SERVICES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv06991
Plaintiff: MICHAEL HAMMOND , VINCENT BARABIN , ROBERT CARTLIDGE and others
Defendant: SUBURBAN WASTE SERVICES, INC., SUBURBAN WASTE SERVICES OF DELAWARE, INC. and LOU BIZZARI, JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SPELLMAN et al v. AMERICAN EAGLE EXPRESS, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv01764
Plaintiff: CLINTON SPELLMAN , JOHN ZIGLAR , MARCUS WELCH, SR. and others
Defendant: AMERICAN EAGLE EXPRESS, INC.
Counter_claimant: AMERICAN EAGLE EXPRESS, INC.
Counter_defendant: SUNDAY CHIMEZIE , ELMUTHANA BASHIR , JEFFREY GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dino et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv01493
Plaintiff: Jay T. Dino, Michael J. Proce, Robert N. Booterbaugh and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Corrections and Jeffrey A. Beard, PH.D.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
HAMMOND et al v. ALCOA, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01746
Plaintiff: GARY HAMMOND and JIM REED
Defendant: ALCOA, INC., THE REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY PENSION PLAN and THE REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY RETIREE GROUP BENEFITS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1002 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
ANDERSON et al v. THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01165
Plaintiff: PHYLLIS ANDERSON, PHYLLIS ANDERSON, PATRICIA A. BREWER and others
Defendant: THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, THE BAKERY AND CONFECTIONERY UNION AND INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?