Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Weinstock v. Rite Aid Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00628
Plaintiff:
Inez Weinstock
Defendant:
Rite Aid Corporation and Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST et al v. STEELE et al
as 2:2010cv02708
Plaintiff:
BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE BOILERMAKERS NATIONAL HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
JUDITH A. STEELE , TIMOTHY STEELE , FELDMAN, SHEPHERD, WOHLGELERNTER, TANNER, WEINSTOCK AND DODIG and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Clement Battoni, et al v. IBEW Local Union 102 Empl Pens, et al
as 09-2030
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEMENT BATTONI, RAYMOND GIULIANO, JAMES W. VREELAND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL PENSION PLAN, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL WELFARE FUND, JOHN E. MCHUGH and others
Ronald Tomasko v. Ira H Weinstock PC, et al
as 08-4673
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONALD T. TOMASKO
Defendant - Appellant:
IRA H WEINSTOCK PC, as Administrator of the Ira H. Weinstock, P.C. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Ira H. Weinstock P.C. Profit Sharing Plan and IRA H. WEINSTOCK, as Trustee of the Ira H. Weinstock, P.C. Money Purchase Pension Plan and Ira H. Weinstock, P.C. profit Sharing Plan and individually
Clement Battoni, et al v. IBEW Local Union 102 Empl Pens, et al
as 08-3924
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLEMENT BATTONI, NEIL BATTONI, RAYMOND S. DEMARCO, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
REGINA DELESKY, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL PENSION PLAN, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL WELFARE FUND and others
Clement Battoni, et al v. IBEW Local Union 102 Empl Pens, et al
as 08-3743
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLEMENT BATTONI, NEIL BATTONI, RAYMOND S. DEMARCO, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellant:
IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL PENSION PLAN, IBEW LOCAL UNION 102 EMPL WELFARE FUND, JOHN E. MCHUGH and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
