Cases 101 - 110 of 141
SAINSBURY v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv04545
Petitioner:
PHILIP SAINSBURY
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, JOHN CLARK and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BIAFORE v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv04540
Petitioner:
ANTHONY R. BIAFORE
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
BLEDSOE v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv04543
Petitioner:
TRAMELL BLEDSOE
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, JOHN CLARK and MICHAEL MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHECO v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv04544
Petitioner:
JAVIER CHECO
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CHARLES v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv04521
Petitioner:
DANIEL CHARLES
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RODRIGUEZ v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv04455
Petitioner:
BELARMINIO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ANTHONY v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv04418
Plaintiff:
RICHARD THOMAS ANTHONY
Defendant:
TROY LEVI and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SANTANA v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv04339
Petitioner:
HENRY SANTANA
Respondent:
TROY LEVI and F.D.C. PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
HUDGINS v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv04291
Petitioner:
WILLIAM HUDGINS
Respondent:
TROY LEVI, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL (ACTING) and JOHN CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHELTON v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv04293
Petitioner:
RAYMOND B. SHELTON
Respondent:
TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
