Cases 111 - 120 of 248
DESTEFANO v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv05160
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. DESTEFANO
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
JONES v. PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv03724
Plaintiff:
ROBERT J. JONES
Defendant:
PENN CENTRAL CORPORATION, CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MATRISCIANO et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65322
Plaintiff:
LOUIE E. MATRISCIANO and NANCY MATRISCIANO
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65568
Plaintiff:
HOWARD P WILLIAMS and BETTY A WILLIAMS
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65057
Plaintiff:
WALTER STONE
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZEIGLER et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv66143
Plaintiff:
ERNEST ZEIGLER and MADELINE ZEIGLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A. W.CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALLIED GLOVE CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GRAHAM et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2001cv66177
Plaintiff:
SARAH GRAHAM
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STOLTZ v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv64919
Plaintiff:
JOHN CHRISTOPHER STOLTZ
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KELLEY v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65138
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN H KELLEY
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GILL et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv65230
Plaintiff:
ROBERT EMORY GILL and MARGARET C GILL
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
