Cases 141 - 150 of 1,045
MELENDEZ RIVERA v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02352
Defendant:
ABC CORPORATION, JANE AND JOHN DOE and WAL-MART STORES, INC. D/B/A WALMART
Plaintiff:
ZAMARYS MELENDEZ RIVERA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
KELLEY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP T/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER et al
as 2:2020cv02304
Plaintiff:
MELISSA KELLEY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP T/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER, WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ocasio v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00792
Plaintiff:
Sibyl Ocasio
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PENNINGTON v. WAL-MART INC. et al
as 1:2020cv05883
Defendant:
WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., WAL-MART STORE #1807, WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GAIL PENNINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RYLEE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2020cv02247
Plaintiff:
ANGIE RYLEE
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 1:2020cv05050
Respondent:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Petitioner:
Milt Cyphert and Laura Cyphert
FICHETOLA v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2020cv04423
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fichetola
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEMAH v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv03224
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION 1-10 and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BEMAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARDILES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2020cv03249
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
GIANNA A. ARDILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PARK et al v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03119
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, #s 1-3, WAL-MART STORES, INC., SAM'S EAST, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN PARK and ROBERT PARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
