Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
WATSON v. ARMSTONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65205
Plaintiff:
DELBERT E WATSON
Defendant:
ARMSTONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64520
Plaintiff:
HIRAM E WATSON and IRENE WATSON
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WATSON v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06208
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA E. WATSON
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WATSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv55912
Plaintiff:
LOREN E. WATSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
WATSON v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57643
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E WATSON
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
WATSON v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34496
Plaintiff:
EDDIE E. WATSON
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WATSON v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34499
Plaintiff:
LOREN E. WATSON
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WATSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77092
Plaintiff:
CARL E. WATSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
WATSON v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74978
Plaintiff:
WALTER E. WATSON
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
