Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Robert Melber v. USA, et al
as 12-3271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT MELBER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, SCOTT M. WALSMAN, M.D., JUNG S. LEE, M.D. and others
Robert Melber v. USA, et al
as 12-8046
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
ROBERT MELBER
Defendant - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, as substituted for Keegan Johnson, M.D., SCOTT M. WALSMAN, M.D., JUNG S. LEE, M.D. and others
LEE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv59500
Plaintiff:
GEORGE S. LEE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56087
Plaintiff:
PING S. LEE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEE v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57277
Plaintiff:
QUOCK S. LEE
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. BRAVEHEART ENTERPRISES, LLC et al
as 5:2011cv06508
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. , RONDOR MUSIC INTERNATIONAL, INC. , MOW B'JOW MUSIC, INC. and others
Defendant:
BRAVEHEART ENTERPRISES, LLC and ANDREW S. LEE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
LEE v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES,LTD.
as 5:2011cv53660
Plaintiff:
QUOCK S. LEE
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES,LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEE v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv49567
Plaintiff:
QUOCK S. LEE
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEE v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44692
Plaintiff:
FONG S. LEE
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LEE et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv36084
Plaintiff:
FRANK S LEE , WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
